In this section, you will examine the landmark Supreme Court decision of Reynolds v. Sims. This case involved the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Interactive exercise. Assistance may be required. Click on the image below to read about the case.


Click on the link below to read more about this case.

Reynolds v. Sims

Answer the following questions about Reynolds v. Sims in your notes.

  1. What right was in dispute in this Supreme Court case?

    Interactive popup. Assistance may be required.

    Click here to compare your answer.

    The right to vote was at the core of this court case.Close Pop Up

  2. According to the Supreme Court’s decision, how did Alabama’s system of apportionment violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment?

    Interactive popup. Assistance may be required.

    Click here to compare your answer.

    Alabama did not redraw its legislative districts using current information on its population. In doing so, all of Alabama was not accounted for; thus, they were not counted as voters. Close Pop Up

The case of Reynolds v. Sims was critical in establishing that apportionment in state legislatures needs to equally reflect the population of the state. This doctrine was another step in ensuring that all citizens had equal protection in the right to vote.

Click on the link below to read more information about the guidelines for legislative redistricting in Texas.

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding The Census and Redistricting

Summary

The 14th Amendment provides equal protection of law to all American citizens. Many important events associated with the civil rights movements are associated with the provisions of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court case of Reynolds v. Sims was based on the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This case established the requirement for state legislatures to create legislative districts with equal populations.